caldwellarianne
caldwellarianne caldwellarianne
  • 19-11-2020
  • History
contestada

Do you agree or disagree with Hamilton and Madison's initial logic that the Bill of Rights was essentially unnecessary? Explain.​

Respuesta :

Аноним Аноним
  • 19-11-2020

Answer:

I do not agree with their view.

Hamilton and Madison believed that a bill of rights would limit the rights that would be protected by the constitution, because some rights would be specified while others wouldn't.  I believe that it is important that the constitution has a bill of rights precisely because it states clearly what rights should be protected, and in which manner.

If new rights are found or accepted by society as a whole in the future, new amendments to the bill of rights can be added.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Based on the graph, how would you describe the motion of the object?
Using the imperfect tense of the verb, write these sentences in Spanish 1. My friend Diego would walk to school through (por) the forest. Would walk2. I used to
why should GMOs be label
It’d be a great help if someone could help me with the 4 practice problems (-,b,c & d)
How did British rule affect people in the British empire?
The codons that signal the end of a polypeptide chain are called?
Assessment items Diana is constructing a regular hexagon inscribed in a circle. She begins by drawing a line and labeling a point on the line as point A. She us
Write an equation for the line
In a __________ system, the citizens directly vote for their leader.
Why is the specific heat capacity of the human body close to, but somewhat less than, that of water?